
As for the movie making of Robert Zemeckis (director and screenwriter) with Charles Dickens’s “
A Christmas Carol” in Disney 3-D, I could say only, wow! The film shows how a writer’s imagination is challenged by rendering of this children’s tale, blowing it up with visual concepts (in live animation, based on 19th Century English life) as well as teaching the moral fable.
Of course, there is the “performance” of Jim Carrey, as the gnarled Ebenezer Scrooge, and all sorts of Christmas ghost characters. Remember Carrey in Parmount’s “
The Truman Show” (Peter Weir, 1998), which might have inspired Stephen King’s “Under the Dome”. In “Truman”, Carrey was this affable salesman guy, with a real marketing profile, and a proclivity for sticking his rear end into the moviegoer’s face. Pretty soon he showed up on Larry King Live, in shorts, and said “the hair ain’t bad”. Well in “Christmas Carol”, the Ghost of Christmas Present (if I have it right) is like God in a Clive Barker novel (Hepaxamendios), complete with hairy chest, which can turn gray. But Scrooge’s own body, especially his gams as well as his visage, has withered away into naked baldness. He is so pathetic. (Actually, Zemeckis would be a natural choice to make Clive Barker’s “
Imajica”, but probably not for Disney; maybe a company like Summit or Lionsgate instead).
Scrooge was a moneylender, and maybe more that, a loan shark, probably capable of making enemies who could do him in. His business partner Marley (Zemeckis communicates this with the signage) has deceased and become a ghost to warn him of his own fate if he doesn’t change his heart. (Somehow, the movie made me think of Thomas B. Costain’s “
Moneyman”, which I read for a book report in Ninth Grade; funny how things come back to you – and Zemeckis could make an interesting movie of that, too.)
Most of us remember the story, and the other characters like office employee Bob Cratchit (Gary Oldman), who has a wife and kids, and Tiny Tim. As the movie develops, it quickly becomes a slam against hyperindividualism (a philosophy that drives Hollywood itself) and even objectivism; Scrooge goes on an early rant to the effect that the poor “deserve it” – something like Herbert Spencer’s philosophy – and then Scrooge is forced to see by the Ghosts the “logical consequences” of his own mindset – to the point that he his confronted with his own coffin, lowering down into Hades. (Maybe he’d wake up in it, like Marlena in “Days of our Lives” in 2004). It all becomes quite existential. He also sees the joys of family life, when shown the Cratchit Christmas dinner, complete with Cornish game hen (what SLDN serves at its fundraisers to end DADT) – Zemeckis really does a great job with food (like the English porridge, green with chick peas, in an early scene – compare to Brad Bird’s “Ratatouille” for Disney in 2007). The dinner scenes somehow reminded me of the movie “The Dead” based on the James Joyce story, with the Christmas dinner scene. In today’s social climate, the story and movie could be viewed as a plea for a more socialized, sustainable set of values.
The official trailer is
here. (Disney did not authorize embedding).
Here’s some Box Office data from Jim Carrey Online,
link.
I love the Walt Disney trademark in 3-D, where the little trail crossing a river bridge approaching the Magic Kingdom creates an "on another planet" look.
I saw this at a Regal in Arlington, 2/3 full during the day on Black Friday – and the same technical glitch (in auditorium 6, with a big flat screen, 2.35:1) that I mentioned in the previous review (“Twilight”, in auditorium 7, big curved screen) caused the sound to cut off during the closing credits. This film comes from a different distributor (Disney v. Summit) but there seems to be a software issue with the way the high-def digital DVD’s communicate with the projection equipment (Regal uses a Sony system) when reaching the end credits. Landmark E Street has not had this problem.